Even the most casual Rays fan knew at the end of 2011 knew the Rays needed to spend some time focused on their catching corps during the winter. Kelly Shoppach, John Jaso, and their host of understudies were simply underwhelming in all facets of the game in 2011.
Despite this glaring weakness, the winter market was unkind to the Rays and they were only able to add Jose Molina. While Molina has a big last name, he is a career backup and, we spent all winter trying to convince ourselves to the contrary. After a month of real baseball, it looks to me like our other offseason “acquisition” will be the actual “solution” at catcher.
Molina was acquired, ostensibly, for his defense. Catcher “defense” means a lot of things to a lot of people. To some, it means a good throwing catcher that keeps pitches away from the backstop, like Pudge Rodriguez. To others, it means an intelligent catcher that manages a pitching staff and calls a good game, like Brad Ausmus.
Gimenez and Molina seem to be on par in the Pudge categories at the moment. Molina has caught 1 of 5 base stealers and allowed 1 passed ball. In half as many starts, Gimenez has caught 2 of 5 base stealers (both last night) and not allowed any passed balls. That is a push.
But, there is a developing body of evidence that suggests that the pitchers like throwing to Gimenez better than they like throwing to Molina. It was on full display last night. The always calm Jeremy Hellickson looked much more comfortable than he had in any previous start — all of which were thrown to Molina.
Take a look at the Rays’ pitcher splits by catcher.
| Split | G | IP | ER | AB | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jose Molina | 13 | 92.0 | 46 | 4.50 | 361 | 48 | 94 | 19 | 1 | 8 | 41 | 63 | 1.54 | .260 | .337 | .385 | .722 | .293 |
| Jose Lobaton | 3 | 23.0 | 11 | 4.30 | 82 | 11 | 19 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 17 | 1.70 | .232 | .312 | .341 | .653 | .277 |
| Chris Gimenez | 5 | 41.0 | 18 | 3.95 | 153 | 21 | 37 | 7 | 0 | 6 | 20 | 35 | 1.75 | .242 | .335 | .405 | .740 | .274 |
Rays pitchers are more than a half-run better with Gimenez in the bucket than they are with Molina in the bucket. The Rays ERA to Molina spikes to 5.76 if you take out the Shutouts thrown by James Shields and David Price in Boston and versus LA. (Why would you take those out? Because Shields is in a place in his career where he is going to feel comfortable throwing to anyone. He’ll shake Molina off and do what he wants. Price, on the other hand, throws one pitch. It doesn’t take a genius to call one of his games. Anyone with an index finger can do it.)
What is Gimenez doing better than Molina? It looks like he is more aggressive in the strike zone. (And, haven’t we spent the entire month wondering why the Rays rotation is suddenly nibbling at the edges and getting yanked early in games?)
With Molina in the bucket, the Rays have walked 4 hitters per nine innings and thrown a whopping 6 wild pitches. With Gimenez, they have walked just 1.3 hitters per nine innings and thrown just two wild pitches. Moreover, the strikeout-walk ratio achieved by Gimenez’s approach far exceeds the same ratio from Molina.
Finally, Molina leads baseball in mound visits. The guy is going to lose 20 pounds this summer walking out to mound every 5th pitch. There is a great Bob Gibson story about McCarver going out for a visit and getting yelled at. Pitchers generally hate that stuff so, you better have a good reason if you are headed to the mound. This isn’t Bull Durham.
Seriously though, For whatever reason, he cannot get on the same page with our guys. That generally isn’t a good sign.
This is a small sample size, obviously. But neither Gimenez nor Molina can hit. So, if Gimenez has the staff working the way we want them to work, then I expect he is going to see a lot more time in the bucket.









Watching Jose call some questionable pitches the first two weeks of the season – BA was lighting him up the way Kevin Kennedy used to light up Navarro about his ability to block pitches – I was wondering if he were unfamiliar with the staff due to the workload in spring training. We knew Molina was going to make the team as the primary catcher because of his contract, so perhaps Lobaton, Chirinos, Vogt, and Gimenez were given more opportunities in order to determine the backup slot. I checked the playing time chart over at Rays Index and Molina lead all catchers in spring training innings, with Gimenez only logging half as many – and only 16 innings where the starters may have been in the game.
Maybe Gimenez spent a lot more time in bullpen sessions with the guys. Maybe it has been a while since Molina has caught a staff that can actually pitch. Maybe Gimenez is just the better catcher at this point in their careers.
I don’t know who tracks those things but, it is a near certainty that Molina didn’t do a lot of bullpen work this spring. He is old and they were asking him for more innings this season than he has ever caught. They were going to save him and give him some veteran deference. There could be something to that.
Mark, great post! Jose Molina is an expensive ($1.5 million dollars for this season with an option of $1.8 million for next) back-up catcher at best who’s laughing and eating his way to the bank! Has limited agility and skills as a catcher and batter and continues to disappoint in his appearances every game he catches. Let’s work on increasing the number of innings and maximizing any potential and skills Jose Lobaton and Chris Gimenez possess to help the Rays pitching staff and let’s stop trying to make Jose Molina a catcher he is not. We will contnue to see Jose fail to motivate the Rays pitching staff, increase the number of pass-balls, exercise poor judgement in throwing out runners, strike-out, and call terrible games. He needs to lose at least 30-40 lbs., if he is to have any chance at improving his limited physical skills to their max. In the mean time, we’ll have to put up with Molina’s clumsiness and watch Little League Joe deal with this catcthing woes…
These days, being a catcher is like being a left-handed reliever. The lack of depth in the market makes it easy to hang on well past your expiration date and participate in the Pudge Rodriguez IRA Roth tour.
Nevertheless, I am not convinced Jose Lobaton is the answer. I would say he is ‘injury-prone’ but I think that is generous. At this point, I think he is just milking it.
Not sure any of the guys we have are the answer, but I’d rather give the opportunities to grow to the guys who (baseball ways) can still learn and grow; that being Lobaton and Gimenez. (if only we can keep Lobaton off of the DL that is)